Back to overview
Case 03 · Post-merger integration

A merger on paper. A split in practice.

Two 350-person professional services firms had merged. Retention numbers looked fine. The Cicuno baseline showed where they really were.

Post-merger integration meeting
Case 03Professional services · 350 employees · Post-merger
Sector
Professional services
Company size
~350 employees
Use
Integration baseline + monitoring
Timeline
Two waves · six months apart
Situation

Four months in. HR metrics green. Informal signals red.

Two mid-sized professional services firms had completed a merger. The combined entity had approximately 350 employees across three locations. Integration had been proceeding for four months, with mixed signals.

Retention numbers looked acceptable, but informal feedback to management suggested significant cultural friction that wasn't showing up in standard HR metrics. The steering group was operating on the assumption that the merger was proceeding adequately.

What we did

One diagnostic, two waves, measurable delta.

Cicuno was deployed as a structured integration diagnostic. The question was focused on how employees were experiencing the merger and what they felt was working or not working — anonymous, unprompted, at scale.

A second wave was planned for six months later to measure shift — turning a one-off snapshot into a monitoring signal the board could rely on.

Integration diagnostic deployment
Fig. 01Deployment — both legacy entities, three locations
What it revealed

Resignation, not resistance — and concentrated in one legacy org.

The results showed a sharp divergence between the two legacy organizations. Staff from the acquired firm scored significantly lower on consensus with leadership and showed a high concentration of responses in the low-influence, high-negativity quadrant — a pattern associated with resignation rather than active resistance.

Specific friction clusters emerged around client ownership protocols, IT systems, and perceived status differences between the two legacy cultures. Problems HR metrics couldn't see.

Legacy-entity split analysis
Fig. 02Consensus and sentiment — by legacy entity
Value created

From adequate monitoring to active intervention.

The Cicuno output reframed the situation as requiring active intervention, not monitoring. Three targeted workstreams were initiated — on client ownership, IT systems, and status reconciliation.

The six-month follow-up showed measurable shift in the influence and consensus scores for the previously at-risk group — providing the board with evidence that integration was on track. Not anecdote. Not assumption. A delta.

“We were looking in the wrong places.”
— Integration lead · Nordic professional services
Output

What the steering group received.

  • Legacy-entity splitConsensus, sentiment, influence — separated by legacy org
  • Resignation / resistance quadrantWhere passive disengagement is concentrated
  • Friction clustersClient ownership, IT, status — ranked and mapped
  • Baseline + follow-up deltaMeasurable shift, wave-on-wave, board-ready